Return-Path: <jstrgjxfdgg@pku.edu.cn>
Delivered-To: matalashes+spam@server.mata-lashes.com
Received: from server.mata-lashes.com
	by server.mata-lashes.com with LMTP
	id 7y6bBF7DbGSbFwAAPWvnSA
	(envelope-from <jstrgjxfdgg@pku.edu.cn>)
	for <matalashes+spam@server.mata-lashes.com>; Tue, 23 May 2023 13:45:02 +0000
Return-path: <jstrgjxfdgg@pku.edu.cn>
Envelope-to: america@mata-lashes.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 May 2023 13:45:02 +0000
Received: from [182.109.55.54] (port=57800 helo=pku.edu.cn)
	by server.mata-lashes.com with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <jstrgjxfdgg@pku.edu.cn>)
	id 1q0Mz8-0006fC-0K
	for america@mata-lashes.com;
	Sat, 20 May 2023 13:51:04 +0000
From: jstrgjxfdgg@pku.edu.cn
To: america@mata-lashes.com
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 21:50:56 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn]
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=29.1
X-Spam-Score: 291
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server.mata-lashes.com",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  
 Content analysis details:   (29.1 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.5 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL     From: localpart has series of non-vowel
                             letters
  0.0 HK_RANDOM_FROM         From username looks random
  0.0 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM      Envelope sender username looks random
  4.7 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
                             [182.109.55.54 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?182.109.55.54>]
  1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL  RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
                             https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
                             [182.109.55.54 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                             [182.109.55.54 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
  4.0 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=jstrgjxfdgg%40pku.edu.cn;ip=182.109.55.54;r=server.mata-lashes.com]
  4.0 SPF_HELO_FAIL          SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo;id=pku.edu.cn;ip=182.109.55.54;r=server.mata-lashes.com]
  2.0 PYZOR_CHECK            Listed in Pyzor
                             (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  0.2 KAM_DMARC_NONE         DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message
                             and the domain has no DMARC policy
  0.5 KAM_NUMSUBJECT         Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE          Message appears to have no textual parts
  0.0 TVD_SPACE_ENCODED      Space ratio & encoded subject
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  =?GB2312?B?tPrpX7eixrExMzUzNzUzODQ0Mg==?=